Why You Shouldn't Moderate Meetings and Take Board Notes at the Same Time

Trying to moderate a meeting and take notes simultaneously might seem efficient. But here’s the truth: multitasking these roles harms productivity and meeting outcomes.

Complete the form above to download the Free Guide: Hybrid Meeting Minutes Toolkit

To help individuals, employers, and HR teams understand how to make the most of their meetings, we’ve created a downloadable guide that includes:

All you need to know about hybrid meetings. 

Effective Meeting Moderation, meeting moderation services, benefits of meeting notes, effective meeting moderation, fostering engagement in meetings, collaborative meeting techniques, remote meeting challenges, best practices for virtual meetings, inclusivity in meetings, ensuring equal participation, active listening in meetings, encouraging participation in meetings, creating positive meeting atmosphere, overcoming technical barriers in remote meetings, maintaining focus in virtual meetings, building personal connections in remote meetings, structured meeting techniques, addressing bias in meetings, managing power dynamics in meetings, capturing meeting key points, action items in meetings, enhancing meeting productivity, inclusive meeting practices, virtual meeting engagement strategies, effective meeting facilitation.

Why You Shouldn’t Moderate and Take Notes at the Same Time

Moderating meetings and simultaneously taking notes might appear productive, especially in smaller teams or quick meetings. But multitasking these critical roles can significantly undermine both tasks, ultimately reducing the effectiveness of your meetings. Here’s a deeper look into why combining moderation and note-taking can lead to challenges:

1. Loss of Focus

Moderators need complete concentration to guide the discussion, manage agendas, maintain time management, and steer conversations effectively. However, note-taking requires its own intensive focus, capturing precise information, action points, and decisions. Splitting attention across these two demanding roles inevitably results in missed critical points and weakened overall meeting outcomes.

2. Decreased Accuracy

Taking detailed notes demands careful listening and precise recording. When moderators attempt this, they risk missing nuanced details, leading to inaccuracies. Important points, tasks, or decisions may not be documented correctly, causing confusion, misunderstandings, or inefficiencies later. This can seriously affect accountability, clarity, and the follow-up process.

3. Reduced Engagement

Effective moderation requires continuous engagement with participants, making eye contact, and actively listening to everyone’s input. When the moderator is preoccupied with note-taking, this direct engagement declines significantly. Participants might perceive their contributions as undervalued, leading to less participation, diminished enthusiasm, and ultimately less productive discussions.

4. Compromised Meeting Flow

Moderation requires fluidity and quick thinking to address and adapt to dynamic conversations. When moderators frequently pause to jot down notes, it disrupts the natural flow and momentum of discussions. Participants might lose interest, and the meeting may become disjointed, impacting the quality and depth of dialogue.

5. Increased Cognitive Load

Managing both moderation and note-taking significantly increases cognitive load, quickly leading to fatigue. Over time, this mental strain can result in chronic stress, decreased effectiveness, and potential burnout. Continuously performing these dual tasks negatively impacts moderators’ overall performance, reducing their ability to facilitate meetings effectively.

6. Limited Opportunity for Clarifications

When moderators multitask, they often lack the capacity to clarify or probe deeper into important points. Critical questions might remain unanswered, and misunderstandings may persist. Consequently, decision-making and strategic planning suffer, reducing the meeting’s overall effectiveness.

Effective Solutions and Alternatives

To ensure efficient, effective, and engaging meetings, consider these alternatives:

Designate a Dedicated Note-taker: Assigning a specific individual to handle notes allows the moderator to focus entirely on guiding discussions effectively.

Record and Review: Utilize audio or video recording to ensure accuracy. After the meeting, use these recordings to create comprehensive notes or summaries.

Use Professional Transcription Services: Employing professional transcription services guarantees highly accurate, timely, and detailed meeting documentation. This solution not only ensures high-quality notes but also boosts participant engagement by removing note-taking responsibilities from all attendees.

Collaborative Note-taking Tools: Leverage digital tools that enable multiple participants to contribute notes collaboratively. This shares the workload, promotes team engagement, and reduces the pressure on any single individual.

Separating moderation and note-taking roles is essential for productive, engaging, and efficient meetings. Clear role delineation enhances focus, accuracy, engagement, and overall meeting effectiveness, contributing significantly to better team performance and morale. Adopting these solutions will yield clearer communication, greater accountability, and more successful outcomes for your organization.